For CRO, med-tech, and imaging teams

Radiology input before imaging decisions get expensive.

Bring a radiologist into the protocol, model, QA issue, or difficult read before the decision is locked in.

  • Trial imagingReader rules and QC plan
  • AI validationGround truth and failure notes
  • Expert reviewFocused radiology memo
Dr. Kushal Parikh, MD, MBAFounder and practicing radiologist
Chest CT displayed on a radiology workstation during image review
ABR-certified radiologistClinical trial imaging strategyRadiology AI validationFDA-cleared AI directoryBody and oncology imaging review

FDA-cleared AI directory

Explore radiology AI solutions on the new subdomain.

The AI directory at ai.parikhradiology.com collects FDA-cleared radiology AI tools with modalities, use cases, vendors, submission numbers, decision dates, and source-linked caveats.

Open AI Directory

Risk areas

Where I usually get called in.

Trial riskThe protocol leaves room for reader drift.

Small wording gaps become big discrepancies once cases start moving.

AI riskThe metric looks better than the clinical claim.

A model can score well and still fail in cases readers care about.

Review riskA difficult read needs another set of eyes.

Some imaging questions need a radiologist who can explain the uncertainty.

Solutions

Specific help for imaging work.

Solution

Clinical Trial Imaging Strategy

Turn protocol language into reader instructions, adjudication triggers, and QC rules.

Reader ChartersProtocol Review
Review trial imaging

Solution

Radiology AI Validation

Check the ground truth, reader disagreement, and failure cases behind the metric.

Ground TruthReader Review
Review AI validation

Solution

Subspecialty Consultation

Focused body and oncology imaging review for difficult cases, QA, and second opinions.

Body MRIOncology Imaging
Review a case or QA question

Fit

When to reach out.

Good fitThe read will change a decision.

Useful when a reader rule, endpoint, validation claim, or difficult case could affect a study, product, or review.

First stepStart with the real question.

Share the project type, imaging domain, and what decision depends on the read.

Not forEmergency or individual patient care.

The first inquiry should avoid patient-identifying information and is not a substitute for urgent clinical care.

Grid of axial brain MRI images used for radiology review

Process

A clearer path.Define the question, structure the read, deliver the output.

01

Read the problem

Start with the protocol, product claim, case, or QA question.

02

Name the judgment calls

Identify where readers may disagree, hesitate, or need escalation.

03

Return usable next steps

Deliver reader rules, validation notes, or a focused radiology memo.

Contact

Start with context.Share the project type and core imaging question.

  • Trial imaging strategy
  • Radiology AI validation
  • Body and oncology imaging review
Preferred pathStructured consultation request

A short request is enough for an initial fit and scope review. No patient-identifying information is needed.

Request Consultation